Skip to main content

in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

It's lazy reporting.

This was at the core of the fuss over 'VNRs' (Video News Releases), which were getting cut up and/or re-voiced to pass as news stories, but were actually press releases.
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

And CNN is considered a "liberal" news outlet. The oligarchs have got us just where they want us. And yet all we have to do is figure out who they are, where they live, and how to tap into their water mains.
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

Point of information: CNN has a new conservative owner, which is why programming has gotten a major reshuffle. Just because this Twit claimed that "CNN wil..." doesn't mean that CNN actually did, so I'm calling bullshit on this one.
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

Joe Biden doesn't want to turn the entirety of the US population against unions, which they would do if there's a railroad strike, so yeah--Biden is legit pro-labor. A railroad strike would be suicidal for all unions.
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

It's all about who controls the narrative. We see this on the Sunday Talkies – the Democrats are bad at getting a unified message in play.

And it's going to be essential in 2024, especially if we haven't gotten off our asses and indicted the former criminal.
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

He's not very pro-labor, though.

The whole point of a strike is that it doesn't matter who dislike it.
It still works.

And after it's done, everybody will understand why they shouldn't mess with labor.
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

"Joe Biden doesn't want to turn the entirety of the US population against unions, which they would do if there's a railroad strike, so yeah--Biden is legit pro-labor. A railroad strike would be suicidal for all unions."
Classic gaslighting & corporate propaganda.The stark really is that Biden has openly sideed with the oligarchs so it doesn't really matter if "public opinion " goes against the unions.there is a groundswell of pro union feeling in the USA & other countries, shown by an increase in militancy
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

And thus a step toward nationalizing railroads was taken, ergo a step toward curbing railroad greedy bastards, and yet I see no joy over that. Pro-strikers want to keep greedy bastard bosses so that they can keep failing at getting a contract.
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

Joe Biden doesn’t want to turn the entirety of the US population against unions, which they would do if there’s a railroad strike, so yeah–Biden is legit pro-labor

Oh and a meta-genius - he knows what is good for the unions though they do not. Amazing his vision, there.
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

Pro-strikers want to keep greedy bastard bosses so that they can keep failing at getting a contract.

You do realize this makes no sense? Are you engaging in sarcasm, or what?
in reply to π••π•šπ•’π•Ÿπ•–π•’ πŸ³οΈβ€βš§οΈ

You realize that failing to see the sense in it is a rejection of reality?

Yet another alternate reality you have going there - so many nowadays...
⇧